Looking Back…Something Wild (1986)

The eighties are perceived as a shallow and materialistic decade that saw entertainment become a ‘product’ released by major corporations and sold in the same way as other commodities. A popular perception is that it was a time swamped with popcorn pictures – lightweight flicks made for children and teenagers.

The best movies of the eighties either celebrated frivolity and gave us great entertainment, or rejected norms and pushed the boundaries towards broader innovations. Eighties Indie movies were especially bold in this regard, and few directors tackled social and personal shape-shifting as deftly or entertainingly as Jonathan Demme.

Image result for something wild

Demme’s early work is characterized by unlikely love stories, crises of identity and emotional metamorphoses. The stories of Melvin and Howard (an all-American bromance), Swing Shift, Something Wild, and Married to the Mob, can verge on the outlandish, but the characters are often strangely grounded by an extraordinarily awareness of their, sometimes unusual, needs and inner lives.

Something Wild, one of his best films, further delineates this strength of personality with characters who are addicted to reinvention, partly as a means of self-discovery and expression but also as a method of exposing the falsehood and absurdity of the society they find themselves in. Over 30 years later, it is still a film in search of the wider audience it always deserved.

The story concerns free-spirited, good-time gal Lulu (Melanie Griffith) as she sets her sights on uptight, yuppie banker Charles Driggs (Jeff Daniels). Her main intent seems to be simply to shock him out of his complacency, to loosen him up and to have a bit of fun.

Their relationship starts off with an unscheduled, afternoon sex-tryst and some bizarre adventures, but then Lulu decides she wants Charles to come home with her and pose as her husband at a high school reunion. There are early hints, that neither Charlie nor Lulu is who he/she seems to be. We start to see that both of them are trading lies to one another, even as they begin to expose each other’s vulnerabilities.

Image result for something wild

Racy brunette Lulu is soon discovered to be the alter-ego of blonde, girl-next-door Audrey Hankel, and events take a decidedly dark turn at the school reunion when they are confronted by her actual husband Ray, played with memorable steely-eyed menace by Ray Liotta, in his first film role.

Ray isn’t content to let Charles and Lulu alone, and the story then leads them down an increasingly weird and dangerous path.

The plot also reinvents itself, starting as a screwball-sex-comedy, then a kind of road movie, changing into a quirky relationship drama, transforming into a tense, violent thriller and ending as an odd celebration of empowerment.

These transitions, while surprising, are nearly seamless. Demme has complete control of the slippery script, and is able to transform the film we thought we had been watching into another one, while keeping the characters and story consistent. In fact, the sly tonal shifts and narrative unpredictability are one of the aspects of the movie that make it such a joy to watch.

To use a phrase coined by Paul Thomas Anderson, Something Wild is a ‘gear shift film’ – a certain type of unclassifiable film that starts off as one thing and, defying all expectations, turns into something quite different, yet remains thematically consistent, even as the narrative changes.

By the time the film ends, Lulu/Audrey has dragged the apparently conventional ‘everyman’ Charles Driggs through at least four versions of herself, and revealed to him (and to us) that it is foolish to distinguish human beings by traits as superficial as appearance.

Directing Melanie Griffiths in possibly her best performance, Demme, at first, presents Lulu/Audrey as a caricature of male fantasy, but as the film proceeds, she develops into a fully realized vulnerable individual, who, although the initial instigator, is also the calm eye of the storm that ensues.

Jeff Daniels as Charles, has an affable demeanour that makes it impossible not to sympathise with him for his bemused, unwitting participation in Lulu’s frenetic adventures, even though we might later marvel at the slow reveal of his other, less harmless, qualities.

Image result for something wild
However, it is the young Ray Liotta who steals the show– the second he dances onto screen (literally), the film receives a frisson of danger and electric tension. Charming and terrifying in equal measure, he’s utterly compelling to watch.

The aptly titled, Something Wild gives us everything the eighties were famous for: laughs, sex, craziness, danger, secret lives, violence, drugs, nasty things in small towns and a great pop music soundtrack, featuring David Byrne, Laurie Anderson, the Feelies, and Sister Carol.

One of the great joys of the film are all the eccentrics drifting through the story, offering opportunities for fleeting cameos by admirers such as John Waters and the real-life mothers of David Byrne and director Demme. Shot by cinematographer Tak Fujimoto, the film is, to use the director’s words—a “hot-house of color”.

Something Wild is a little masterpiece which didn’t go unnoticed at the time of its release. Critics loved it; it received several Golden Globe nominations and its stars went on to act in bigger films. Full of unexpected twists, it’s a piece of unusual, thrilling, brilliant and unique movie entertainment – truly a little treasure.


Rest in Peace Jonathon Demme 

A Moving Image – Review

A Moving Image, the debut feature of writer-director Shola Amoo, is interesting in a way that perhaps is unintentional. It is about the difficulty of joining a group when they are suspicious of your motives. It is also about the problem of tackling an issue that does not directly affect you. How can you be passionate and committed when you have no connection, no heart?

Image result for a moving image

His protagonist is Nina (Tanya Fear) a young woman who returns to Brixton in South London after a personally unfulfilling period hanging out with friends in East End. Moving in to a barely furnished flat, she tries to make a new start, auditioning for a film in which her character resists sex and then gives in. The director wants Nina’s character to be taken and then to like it, perpetuating a familiar and depressing stereotype used to justify rape, but Nina’s attempt to find the truth in the scene loses her the part. Her co-star, Mickey (Alex Austin) tries to get a date with her. She is resistant to this as well.

With her best friend as editor, she embarks on a video project, to capture the effects on gentrification in Brixton. In the course of this journey, she meets a performance artist (Aki Omoshaybi) who makes no concessions to his audience and who – like Mickey – also doesn’t hit it off with her. Nevertheless, he agrees to help.

What follows is the making of a documentary in which its real subject – the impact of urban cleansing in which local residents and business are displaced in favour of the middle class – is placed at a remove. Amoo, you sense, isn’t qualified to talk about it. This film is his way of being true to his position.

Image result for a moving image film

There is a difficulty though in discussing gentrification as if the alternative is some kind of nirvana. Street crime isn’t mentioned. When we first see Nina emerge from Brixton Tube, we don’t hear the classical music that is piped out of the station as a calming measure to take the edge of itchy stick-ups with their thick collars and flicked knives and – I’m beginning to sound like that poet from the ‘Nationwide’ ad. The film looks like it was shot some time ago, though Reclaim Brixton, the protest group featured in the film, is still active.

We get glimpses of protests outside the Ritzy Cinema, street performances and an interview with a cafe owner. A loud guy claims the camera and sings the praises of Peckham. (No comment.) We also see Nina struggling to win the confidence of the protestors.

The subject of gentrification never takes over the narrative. What we are left with is fragments of a debate about a social problem which never goes above grass roots level or is not even tackled at source. A Moving Image is not the product of a confident filmmaker with passion in his belly. At its best, it is a way of dealing with gentrification by creating a film that a gentrified audience might want to see.

La Strada – Brand New Trailer!

Federico Fellini is a much celebrated director, known for the combination of fantasy and social commentary. He crafted one of the much beloved movies with 81/2. Now his work is being re-celebrated, thanks to the release of 1954’s La Strada

The film revolves around outsiders. Gelsomina is a young woman who is sold to strongman Zampano to be both his wife and performance assistant. Zampanò regularly abuses her as she tries to learn the ropes. Broken, she finds a kindred spirit in the Fool. Will tensions rise as they find themselves part of the same travelling circus?

Peppered with bohemian dogma as well as sparking of a neorealist movement, La Strada is famed for the poetry it weaved in Italian cinema. We’re thrilled to see it return to the big screen!


La Strada is out 19th May

Maudie – Trailer!

The Academy Award nominated Sally Hawkins is one of our best actress. Whether it’s sparring with Cate Blanchett in Blue Jasmine or chirping gleefully in Happy Go Lucky, she has gifted us with some achingly memorable performances.

Alongside Ethan Hawk, she is set to make more waves with Maudie.

Maudie is based on a true story when reclusive Everett Lewis finds solace in housekeeper Maudie. Together, they find meaning in the word, as Maudie craves to create art and move away from her parents, despite her crippled hands.

Though there is a stab of over-sentimentality, this looks to be a sweet affair with two promising leads.

What do you think?


Maudie is out later this year!